Politics: Education HB 2625 Recap and the Gubernatorial Race

Clayton Flesher

 

House of Representatives Monday afternoon. Photo cred: Helen Grant .

House of Representatives Monday afternoon. Photo cred: Helen Grant

 

Late Friday last week the Oklahoma State Department of Education (SDE) released the results in the first run of high stakes testing for Oklahoma’s third graders. There were a number of headlines, including how many Oklahoman third graders risk being held back (nearly 8,000), how unfair it was for the SDE to release results to the media before schools had a chance to see them or contact parents and let them know if their child had passed, and the inevitable outrage that third graders were being subjected to such high stakes testing at all.

After a weekend of angry phone calls and emails from parents, educators and administrators, it didn’t take long for the Oklahoma Legislature to respond. Monday afternoon, House Bill 2625 passed through the Oklahoma House. House Bill 2625 ensures parents and educators have input in determining whether or not to hold a third grader back. The bill will change the language established by the Reading Sufficiency Act in 2011.

Instead of having the decision made in the Oklahoma legislature through an automatic process, the decision on whether or not a student should advance to fourth grade will be made by a committee of the student’s guardians, the reading teachers, and the school principal. If the committee unanimously agrees, the student will advance to fourth grade and continue to be monitored. If there is not an unanimous agreement, the student will be held back in third grade.

In the House on Monday, the debate on the bill revolved around why so many of Oklahoma’s students are doing poorly. Proponents of the bill argued that students in poorer districts are not failing because of the schools, but because of things like access to food and supportive home life. According to Oklahoma Watch, in opposition to the bill Mike Reynolds said that education in Oklahoma is funded quite well and that more money won’t help.

 

via Oklahoma Watch Twitter

via Oklahoma Watch Twitter

 

On the flip side The Oklahoma Policy Institute, a non-partisan,statewide think tank based in Tulsa, asserts that Oklahoma doesn’t fund education adequately and is actually #1 in the nation for spending cuts per pupil, #44 in the nation in per-pupil funding, and #49 in the nation for teacher salaries. 

 

"Did you know? Oklahoma is No. 1 in the nation for the percentage of spending cuts per student. Together we can do better. http://bit.ly/1qirssk " via The Oklahoma Policy Institute

Full article: http://bit.ly/1qirssk

 

HB 2625, which originated in the Oklahoma House and had already made it through the Senate with amendments, will now go to Governor Mary Fallin. State Superintendent Janet Barresi stated her opposition to the bill, but the vast majority of the Oklahoma Legislature supported it. The only State Senator to vote against it was Clark Jolley of Edmond. Only six members of the House voted no: John Enns, Mike Reynolds, John Trebilcock, Jason Nelson, Mike Ritze and Paul Wesselhoft.

This is one of those cases where a governor has a clear chance to influence the direction Oklahoma’s education system will take. If Mary Fallin decides to go ahead and veto this popular bill, it’ll be a campaign issue for her main opponent in the upcoming gubernatorial race, Democrat Joe Dorman. Dorman, a member of the Oklahoma House, spoke in favor of HB 2625 on Monday, and voted for it.

One of Dorman’s top issues is education, with his campaign website pointing out that Oklahoma ranks 49th in teacher pay and has cut our funds per student by more than any other state, 22.8%.

Until now, the Reading Sufficiency Act has been a bragging point under the Accomplishments section of the governor’s reelection website. How the governor responds to this situation, and whether she’ll continue to use the RSA on her campaign literature, only time will tell.

 

via maryfallin.org

via maryfallin.org

 

3 Comments
  1. I’m glad they’re at least trying to fix the problem, I just wish they hadn’t chosen possibly the clunkiest “fix” they could come up with. Do we really need the legislature telling educators how to decide if a child advances to the next grade level? Does anyone think that this is an appropriate use of power on their part?

  2. Please, we desperately need more special education teachers and reading specialists. Lack of funding is an issue! Anybody who is not an educator does not see the disparity that many of our children from the poorest regions of our state go through. It is heartbreaking and most teachers who do help or work in these areas are spread out too thin to do much good. Why do many of our house members sit at the capital in ignorant bliss? If they would come spend 2 days in a school like where I teach at, I guarantee you most would take a more aggressive stand.

  3. I don’t have the figures in front of me, but I have read of the very high percentage of public school students who receive or qualify for free or reduced-fee lunch programs and sometimes breakfast as well–it’s in the 90% range in OKC and Tulsa. This astounds me and indicates a very unstable home life for the students.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *